Google+
  • Ocwen21.48-4.78 -18.20%
  • Zillow109.01+1.21 +1.12%
  • Trulia46.12+0.76 +1.68%
  • NationStar34.710.00 0.00%
  • CoreLogic28.24+0.51 +1.84%
  • RE/MAX31.44-0.05 -0.16%
  • Fannie Mae2.40+0.13 +5.73%
  • Freddie Mac2.26+0.16 +7.62%
  • Wells Fargo50.45+1.27 +2.58%
  • CitiMortgage51.27+0.74 +1.46%
  • Bank of America16.60+0.34 +2.09%
  • Fidelity National Financial28.75+0.45 +1.59%
  • First American28.75+0.44 +1.55%
  • AUDUSD=X0.8791N/A N/A
  • USDJPY=X106.878N/A N/A
  • WP Stock Ticker
Home | Daily Dose | Yellen Faces Grilling in First Hearing as Fed Chair
Print This Post Print This Post

Yellen Faces Grilling in First Hearing as Fed Chair

If nothing else, Janet Yellen proved on Tuesday she has stamina.

The newly installed Federal Reserve chair—the first woman to take the post in the institution’s century-long history—sat in front of the House Financial Services Committee for an extended session, fielding dozens of questions on topics ranging from the Fed’s current direction to GSE reform.

Yellen’s prepared remarks for the committee echoed much of what analysts have seen in recent Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statements, with references to a recovering (but still weakened) labor market, a slowing housing market, restrictive fiscal policy, and the usual prediction of a “moderate” expansion in the nation’s economic activity.

She also told House members not to expect any great change in policy now that she’s at the helm.

“[L]et me emphasize that I expect a great deal of continuity in the FOMC’s approach to monetary policy,” she said. “I served on the Committee as we formulated our current policy strategy and I strongly support that strategy, which is designed to fulfill the Federal Reserve’s statutory mandate of maximum employment and price stability.”

Having said that, Yellen emphasized “purchases are not on a preset course,” and the FOMC’s decisions about whether or not to taper will continue to hinge on its outlook from meeting to meeting.

With the last two employment reports suggesting a possible slowdown in economic growth, the Fed chair was reluctant to discuss what they might mean for the possibility of further cuts to purchases in the FOMC’s next meeting.

“The pace of job creation [in December and January] was running under what I had anticipated, but we have to be very careful not to jump to conclusions in interpreting what those reports mean,” she said, adding that the committee has data to consider beyond employment rates. “I think it’s important to take our time to assess just what the significance of this is.”

She also left open the possibility for a ramp up in asset purchases should economic conditions deteriorate significantly.

Another topic of interest for the House committee were Yellen’s thoughts on housing finance reform as industry players and policymakers offer up their ideas for moving forward on Fannie and Freddie.

“I think the time has come,” she said. “I hope that you will deal with a reform of the GSEs, and there are a variety of ways to do it, but I think the government should make its intended role more explicit and make sure that whatever entities are set up to deal with housing finance ... don’t create systemic risks to the financial system.”

One subject left out of Tuesday’s hearing was the Fed’s latest round of annual capital stress tests, the results of which are expected to land in March. Of course, she’ll have another opportunity to discuss it this week—when she appears before the Senate Banking Committee Thursday.

Bookmark and Share

About Author: Tory Barringer

Tory Barringer
Tory Barringer began his journalism career in early 2011, working as a writer for the University of Texas at Arlington's student newspaper before joining the DS News team in 2012. In addition to contributing to DSNews.com, he is also the online editor for DS News' sister publication, MReport, which focuses on mortgage banking news.

One comment

  1. Avatar of Gabriel David

    “The pace of job creation [in December and January] was running under what I had anticipated, but we have to be very careful not to jump to conclusions in interpreting what those reports mean,”

    Is this because of the time it takes for policies to actually have an effect? And is there some sort of set amount of time between when a policy is created/set in place and when the effect is visible?

Leave a Reply

Scroll To Top