Home / Daily Dose / Legal Action Possible for Excessive Lender-Placed Insurance Rates
Print This Post Print This Post

Legal Action Possible for Excessive Lender-Placed Insurance Rates

In 2012, lender-placed insurance issues cost Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac a combined $360 million, and now the federal government may take legal action against servicers for charging excessive LPI rates, according to a report released Wednesday by the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s Office of the Inspector General.

The report comes on the heels of several lawsuits‒‒most of which have been settled out of court and for substantial amounts of money‒‒that borrowers have filed against the nation's top lenders in the past few years. Wells Fargo and QBE, for example, settled a class action suit in Florida last spring for $19 million and agreed to reimburse or credit affected borrowers 25 percent of any LPI premiums they assessed.

Last September, JPMorgan Chase and Assurant settled with a nationwide class of borrowers for $300 million and agreed to reimburse or credit affected borrowers 12.5 percent of any LPI premiums they assessed. And  in February, Citibank and a class of borrowers agreed to a $95 million settlement in which the lender also agreed to reimburse or credit affected borrowers 12.5 percent.

The trouble itself stems from GSE-serviced mortgage holders defaulting on Fannie/Freddie-required coverage. Fannie and Freddie's servicers are required to ensure that their client homeowners maintain hazard insurance for the life of the mortgage. These servicers often outsource the tracking of this insurance and the payments to specialty insurers.

When an insurer identifies a payment lapse it initiates LPI coverage, which homeowners are expected to keep up with. However, not all do, and in the event of a foreclosure Fannie and Freddie get stuck with the bill.

In 2012 and 2013, insurance regulators in several states determined that LPI rates in their respective states were excessive and may have been driven up by profit-sharing arrangements under which servicers were paid to steer business toward LPI providers in the form of commission structures and reinsurance deals.

This, of course, led to the class-action suits that have so far amounted to $674 million in settlement payments. Last November, FHFA sought to mitigate financial harm to Fannie and Freddie by directing them to prohibit their servicers from receiving LPI-related commissions and entering into reinsurance arrangements with LPI providers. But those new rules did not take effect until June 1 and the grand total for how much the GSE’s are out due to LPI-related issues is not yet clear.

FHFA is still considering whether Fannie and Freddie should pursue litigation against servicers and LPI providers to recover potential damages that the enterprises have lost cleaning up LPI-related messes.

About Author: Scott Morgan

Scott Morgan is a multi-award-winning journalist and editor based out of Texas. During his 11 years as a newspaper journalist, he wrote more than 4,000 published pieces. He's been recognized for his work since 2001, and his creative writing continues to win acclaim from readers and fellow writers alike. He is also a creative writing teacher and the author of several books, from short fiction to written works about writing.
x

Check Also

Federal Reserve Holds Rates Steady Moving Into the New Year

The Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee again chose that no action is better than changing rates as the economy begins to stabilize.