Google+
  • Ocwen19.51+0.47 +2.47%
  • Zillow108.45+4.02 +3.85%
  • Trulia46.09+2.26 +5.16%
  • NationStar32.59-0.72 -2.16%
  • CoreLogic30.28+2.32 +8.30%
  • RE/MAX31.08-0.64 -2.02%
  • Fannie Mae2.28+0.04 +1.79%
  • Freddie Mac2.21+0.06 +2.79%
  • Wells Fargo50.60+0.43 +0.86%
  • CitiMortgage51.41+0.71 +1.40%
  • Bank of America16.60+0.20 +1.22%
  • Fidelity National Financial28.98+0.38 +1.33%
  • First American28.91+0.49 +1.72%
  • AUDUSD=X0.876N/A N/A
  • USDJPY=X108.155N/A N/A
  • WP Stock Ticker
Home | News | Foreclosure | Regulators: Completed Foreclosures in Q3 Up 57% from Year Ago
Print This Post Print This Post

Regulators: Completed Foreclosures in Q3 Up 57% from Year Ago

New data from federal regulators show that the nation's largest banks and thrifts repossessed nearly 187,000 homes during the third quarter of 2010. The number of foreclosures completed during the three-month period is up 14.7 percent from the previous quarter and is 57.5 percent more than a year earlier.

[IMAGE]

The figures provided by the ""Office of the Comptroller of the Currency"":http://www.occ.gov (OCC) and the ""Office of Thrift Supervision"":http://www.ots.treas.gov (OTS) are based on information collected from nine institutions with the largest mortgage servicing portfolios among national banks and thrifts.

The reporting firms include: Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, HSBC, MetLife, PNC, U.S. Bank, Wells Fargo, and OneWest Bank (formerly IndyMac). The report covers about 64 percent of all first-lien mortgages in the country, worth $5.8 trillion in outstanding balances.

The regulators' quarterly ""mortgage performance report"":http://www.occ.gov/publications/publications-by-type/other-publications/mortgage-metrics-q3-2010/mortgage-metrics-q3-2010.pdf shows that new foreclosures initiated by these institutions also rose during the July to September timeframe, before the robo-signing scandal broke. The number of foreclosure starts in Q3 increased to more than 382,000 - 31.2 percent more than in the previous quarter and 3.7 percent more than in the third quarter of 2009.

All in all, the reporting institutions counted 1.2 million foreclosures in process as of September 30, 2010, according to the report. That represents a record-high 3.6 percent of their combined servicing portfolios.

[COLUMN_BREAK]

""Completed foreclosures, which have risen for six consecutive quarters, are expected to continue rising as servicers and borrowers exhaust home retention options to assist borrowers with seriously delinquent mortgages,"" regulators noted in the report.

Although foreclosure activity increased during the third quarter, the servicers reported almost twice as many home retention actions as completed home forfeiture actions. They implemented 470,321 home retention actions, including loan modifications, trial period plans, and shorter term payment plans.

By comparison, there were 244,840 home forfeiture actions, which takes into account the 187,000 completed foreclosures, as well as approximately 56,200 short sales and 1,700 deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure.

Home forfeiture actions in Q3 were up 11 percent from the previous quarter, while home retention actions dropped by 17 percent, the regulators reported.

According to the OCC and OTS, servicers modified 1,506,025 loans from the beginning of 2008 through the second quarter of 2010. At the end of the third quarter of 2010, 48 percent of these modifications remained current or were paid off, but the report notes that more recent modifications have been performing better than the earlier ones.

At six months after modification, 20.2 percent of the modifications made in the fourth quarter of 2009 were seriously delinquent compared with 33.5 percent of the modifications made during the second quarter of 2009, according to the regulators’ analysis.

They also pointed out that modifications under the federal government’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) are performing better than servicers’ proprietary modifications implemented during the same period.

At six months after modification, the re-default rate for HAMP modifications was about half that of other modifications. The regulators attribute the distinction to HAMP’s emphasis on repayment sustainability, namely guidelines that ensure monthly payments are reduced and are affordable relative to verified borrower income, as well as the completion of a successful trial payment period.

Bookmark and Share

About Author: Carrie Bay

Carrie Bay
Carrie Bay is a freelance writer for DS News and its sister publication MReport. She served as online editor for DSNews.com from 2008 through 2011. Prior to joining DS News and the Five Star organization, she managed public relations, marketing, and media relations initiatives for several B2B companies in the financial services, technology, and telecommunications industries. She also wrote for retail and nonprofit organizations upon graduating from Texas A&M University with degrees in journalism and English.

Leave a Reply

Scroll To Top