Home / News / Foreclosure / 1st Time Jobless Claims Continue to Drop
Print This Post Print This Post

1st Time Jobless Claims Continue to Drop

Continuing the drop in first time claims for unemployment insurance, initial filings fell 5,000 for the week ended September 21 to 305,000, the ""Labor Department"":http://www.ows.doleta.gov/press/2013/092613.asp reported Thursday. Economists had expected the number of claims to jump up to 330,000, from the 309,000 originally reported for the week ending September 14. The number of filings for that week was revised up to 310,000.

The four week moving average of first time filings fell to 308,000, the lowest level since June 2007 from 315,0000 one week earlier.

[IMAGE]

Continuing claims for jobless benefits â€" reported on a one-week lag â€" rose 35,000 to 2,823,000 for the week ending September 14. The number of continuing claims for the week ending September 7 was revised up to 2,788,000 from the originally reported 2,787,000.

The four week moving average of continuing claims dropped 42,750 to 2,842,500, the lowest since February 2008.

Initial claims data for the week ending September 7 had been affected by the Labor Day holiday and because California and one other, unidentified, state upgraded their computer systems delaying processing claims. But there were no similar exogenous events for the week covered by today's report.

First time claims have declined in four of the last five weeks with the only increase â€" 16,000 for the week ending September 14 â€" representing a correction to account for the computer upgrades.

The Labor Department reports have been affected as well by favorable seasonal adjustment factors built around recurring, historic events which included tropical storms. Those storms did not materialize this year but the adjustment factors anticipated and accounted for them nonetheless. Claims often jump following such storms and the adjustment factors are designed to make reduce the volatility.

Initial claims generally reflect layoffs while continuing claims reflect hiring. A decrease in continuing claim suggests employers have a collective need for more workers while an increase in first-time claims suggests companies may be over-staffed.

This week's report revised data for the ""reference week"" used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in preparing the monthly employment situation release â€" which includes the unemployment rate â€" for September to be reported October 4. That the claims data remained significantly lower than recent weeks could suggest an important shift

[COLUMN_BREAK]

in labor trends. However, workers hired for summer jobs at retailers or restaurants and hotels could swell unemployment ranks when those jobs end with the close of the summer. Retail and restaurant and hotel jobs represented nearly half of the increase in employment in the last three months.

From mid-August to mid-September the number of first time claims dropped 27,000 and the four week moving average fell 15,500, suggesting layoffs were less of a drag on payrolls. That said, the four week moving average of initial claims fell 16,000 from mid-July to mid-August and the BLS reported payrolls grew a disappointing 169,000 in August as the unemployment rate fell to 7.3 percent largely because of dropout from the labor force which fell 312,000 or 0.2 percent â€" five times the average decline in the labor force in the previous 12 months.

The always important unemployment rate took on added significance in light of the Federal Reserve's announced intention to begin tapering its monetary stimulus program once the unemployment rate drops to 6.5 percent. Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke reiterated that intention following last week's meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee.

The Labor Department said the total number of people claiming benefits in all programs for the week ending September 7 was 3,921,399, an increase of 22,769 from the previous week. There were 5,173,998 persons claiming benefits in all programs in the comparable week in 2012. No state was providing Extended Benefits program during the week ending September 7. Extended benefits have been affected by the federal government sequestration. States have responded to the reduced federal funds by either cutting the number of weeks of eligibility or lowering weekly payments.

According to the BLS, 11,316,000 persons were officially considered unemployed in August with 4,290,000 ""long-term"" unemployed that is, out of work for at least 27 weeks. Of those individuals counted as unemployed, 7.40 million were not receiving any form of government unemployment insurance for the week ended September 7, up from 7.27 million one week earlier.

The Labor Department also said 1,348,526 persons claiming Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC) benefits for the week ending September 7, an increase of 32,563 from the prior week. There were 2,160,448 persons claiming EUC in the comparable week in 2012. EUC benefits this year were also directly threatened by the federal budget sequester.

According to the Labor Department detail, also reported on a one-week lag, the largest increases in initial claims for the week ending September 14 were in California (+22,611), Florida (+3,946), Georgia (+2,690), Nevada (+2,504), and New York (+1,871), while the largest decreases were in Oklahoma (-439), Tennessee (-404), Kansas (-351), Massachusetts (-304), and Idaho (-294).

The increase in first time claims in California, the Labor Department said, reflected the first full week of processing under the new, upgraded computer system there.

_Hear Mark Lieberman Friday on P.O.T.U.S. radio, Sirius-XM 124, at 6:20 am eastern time._
_Follow Mark Lieberman on Twitter at @foxeconomics._

About Author: Mark Lieberman

Mark Lieberman is the former Senior Economist at Fox Business Network. He is now Managing Director and Senior Economist at Economics Analytics Research. He can be heard each Friday on The Morning Briefing on POTUS on Sirius-XM Radio 124.
x

Check Also

Federal Reserve Holds Rates Steady Moving Into the New Year

The Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee again chose that no action is better than changing rates as the economy begins to stabilize.