Home / Daily Dose / Wildfire Report Finds Disproportionate Economic Risk for Idaho, Wyoming
Print This Post Print This Post

Wildfire Report Finds Disproportionate Economic Risk for Idaho, Wyoming

Wildfire resiliencyIt is no secret that when a drought arrives, the threat of wildfires is sure to follow. This year, these wide-ranging severe drought conditions are occurring primarily in the plains states and most of the western portion of the country this year and is on track to follow previous record-setting years. 

According to the National Interagency Fire Center, 46,091 wildfires have burned a total of 5,907,288 acres nationwide this year, making it the sixth-highest year for both acres burned and number of fires in the U.S. over the past decade. But it is critical to note that the traditional heart of the wildfire season is yet to come. 

Peak wildfire season runs from August through November, and the next three months will be key in deciding whether 2021 is another record-breaking year. 

In 2018, wildfires destroyed 25,790 structures of which 70% were residential, according to the National Interagency Coordination Center. In 2019 the number of structures dropped to 963 of which 46% were residential. 2020 saw a steep rise in the number of structures lost to wildfires, 17,904, of which 54% were residential. 

Traditionally California tops the list for states most in danger of wildfires because of its location and population. However, the resiliency of is often measured as how fast one can recover from a catastrophe. For example, when 800 homes are destroyed in California, the market can recover faster due to a large housing inventory in the state. But if 800 homes are destroyed in Wyoming, it may take years for those people to recover due to its limited stock of homes. 

According to a report by CoreLogic—a global property information and analytics company—in states like Wyoming and Idaho, the number of homes at risk is a larger fraction of the total number of homes in the state. If a larger portion of the population is displaced at a single time, recovery times may be elongated, fewer local workers might be available—and likely distracted rebuilding their own lives— and fewer hotels and housing options may be available to outside workers due to local populace demand. 

“There’s no denying a state like California is at severe risk for wildfire destruction every year, as seen in the ongoing Dixie Fire,” said Tom Larsen, Principal of insurance solutions at CoreLogic. “But it’s important to acknowledge that not all communities and their catastrophic events are the same, and the road to recovery can look drastically different. Resilience is often measured as how fast you can recover from a catastrophe—and the deeper the wound, the longer it takes to heal.” 

2021 Wildfire Data

The report found Wyoming had the greatest portion of its housing stock in danger of being lost to wildfires (0.29%). It was followed by Idaho (0.22%), New Mexico (0.17%), Utah (0.15%) and Nevada (0.14%). 

Idaho and Wyoming have the highest risk, despite their low population, because the number of homes at risk in the state is a larger fraction of the total number of homes in the state. 

This may also lead to longer recovery times as a larger portion of the population may be displaced because their homes were destroyed,” the report said. “This snowball effect may lead to more recovery work, fewer available local workers as they are distracted with trying to rebuild their own lives, and fewer hotels and housing options available to outside workers because the local populace needs them.” 

For example, Wyoming has a total of 281,937 housing units, of which the report found that 821 are in danger of burning in a 1-in-50 year wildfire. Idaho has 768,815 units of which 1,709 are in danger. 

To help mitigate potential losses, the report said that a number of parties need to come together in order to help reduce future losses. 

“Looking ahead, insurers, city planners and homeowners each play an important role in reducing the devastating impacts of wildfires and they can work together to mitigate future events,” the report said. “While these natural catastrophes are often unavoidable, they can be prepared for. By equipping clients with the latest data and insights, CoreLogic’s goal is to help its clients better inform homeowners of their risk and accelerate their recovery.” 

CoreLogic used its Wildfire Risk model to identify a 1-in-50-year fire scenario in each of the 14 wildfire-prone states (13 western U.S. states plus Florida) to understand how many homes would be at risk of being damaged in a wildfire at least once in 50 years (the average length to which residential homes are built to last, via building codes). CoreLogic compared the number of homes at risk of damage from a 1-in-50-year fire (an extreme event) to the total housing stock in each state to determine the communities that have the most economic risk from wildfire. Wildfires that devastate large numbers of homes are infrequent. The number of homes included in the 1-in-50 year fire analysis has a 98% probability of not being exceeded in a single year (or the maximum number of homes that could burn in a single year) 

About Author: Kyle G. Horst

Kyle G. Horst is a reporter for DS News and MReport. A graduate of the University of Texas at Tyler, he has worked for a number of daily, weekly, and monthly publications in South Dakota and Texas. With more than 10 years of experience in community journalism, he has won a number of state, national, and international awards for his writing and photography including best newspaper design by the Associated Press Managing Editors Group and the international iPhone photographer of the year by the iPhone Photography Awards. He most recently worked as editor of Community Impact Newspaper covering a number of Dallas-Ft. Worth communities on a hyperlocal level. Contact Kyle G. at [email protected].
x

Check Also

Federal Reserve Holds Rates Steady Moving Into the New Year

The Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee again chose that no action is better than changing rates as the economy begins to stabilize.