Home / Daily Dose / Under Trump or Biden, GSE Reform Path is ‘Uncertain’
Print This Post Print This Post

Under Trump or Biden, GSE Reform Path is ‘Uncertain’

White HouseIn September 2019, President Donald Trump and his administration initiated a process whereby Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would exit conservatorship. Former Freddie Mac CEO Don Layton, now a Senior Industry Fellow at Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies, says the White House waited too long to start and finish the entire process, which should involve keeping key reforms developed over the course of conservatorship (since 2008) in place. Thus, should Trump not serve another term, procedures would have to resume under a new administration.

As the current administration launched the process with little more than a year left in its term, "it will not be able to complete many of the key requirements for conservatorship exit, and full re-capitalization until a possible second term, which is far from a certainty based on today’s election polls."

Layton went on to outline three possible scenarios, should former VP Joe Biden be elected in November, in his paper entitled, The Path of GSE Reform: Still Very Uncertain, and Not Just Because of the Elections.

Inside the paper, Layton outlined three alternative approaches a Biden administration might adopt:

  1. "The first, and lowest risk, alternative is no change, i.e. to leave the companies in conservatorship for the time being."
  2. "The second, a medium-to-low risk alternative, is to end the conservatorships through a patient “administrative means” implementation of what is known as the utility model, where the safety-and-soundness regulator of the GSEs, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), also becomes like a public service commission to regulate their guarantee fees, much as utilities have their rates set by such commissions at the state level."
  3. "The last, and highest risk alternative recommended is a strong progressive program to convert the two GSEs into a single, government-owned corporation, which would require legislation as well as many years for that single corporation to become fully capitalized."

He also explains that, due to a case currently in the supreme court that would allow a new President to immediately replace the FHFA, appointed by Trump, rather than having to wait until 2024 for the current director’s five year term to end. That means "a Biden administration will have more ability to control GSE reform, under any scenario it chooses," he said.

Of the three alternatives, Layton recommends on a practical basis avoiding the government corporation alternative for two reasons:

"First, as it requires so much change, it runs a high implementation risk, which can only work against a Biden administration because of its one-way nature. If the implementation goes well, the homeowning public will hardly notice; but if it goes poorly, the mortgage market disruption could generate major negative political ramifications," he said. "Second, the government corporation alternative requires legislation. This would run up against the track record of Congress failing for more than a decade to put in the time needed to develop, and then make the compromises needed to reach agreement about, specific GSE reform legislation. This is especially true in the incredibly complex housing finance field where constructing well-designed legislation is a very heavy lift. Even if the Democrats control both houses of Congress, agreement is far from assured as there are definitely competing views among elected officials from that party about the right way to proceed."

Layton offers up suggestions for a possible second Trump administration. He thinks No. 3 is risky in any case.

"There are many key decisions still to be made that can significantly impact [the GSEs'] business model—which in turn can materially change their future business prospects in terms of revenues, expenses, and return-on-equity, the single most important measure of success for a large financial institution ... it is still quite uncertain how it will go or what could emerge at the other end."

Layton sees a long road ahead, no matter the outcome of the Presidential election:

"Unfortunately, at this time, we really still have little idea of how long it will take for the GSEs, in any form, to exit the conservatorship and be able to operate normally (however that is defined at the time)," he wrote in his paper. "It’s true regardless of whether President Trump or Former Vice President Biden is sitting in the White House. All we can hope for then is that GSE reform design and implementation is done well in the future during the next four-year presidential administration, regardless of who leads it, to hopefully, at last, put this all to bed."

See Layton's full editorial here, and more about the full paper, here.

About Author: Christina Hughes Babb

Christina Hughes Babb is a reporter for DS News and MReport. A graduate of Southern Methodist University, she has been a reporter, editor, and publisher in the Dallas area for more than 15 years. During her 10 years at Advocate Media and Dallas Magazine, she published thousands of articles covering local politics, real estate, development, crime, the arts, entertainment, and human interest, among other topics. She has won two national Mayborn School of Journalism Ten Spurs awards for nonfiction, and has penned pieces for Texas Monthly, Salon.com, Dallas Observer, Edible, and the Dallas Morning News, among others.

Check Also

Housing Markets Most Impacted by COVID-19

Property-data analysts examine county-level housing markets around the United States that are more or less vulnerable to the impact of the virus pandemic.

Your Daily Dose of DS News

Get the news you need, when you need it. Subscribe to the Daily Dose of DS News to receive each day’s most important default servicing news and market information, absolutely free of charge.