Home / Daily Dose / Miller: Recapitalized Fannie, Freddie a (Bad) 20-year Option
Print This Post Print This Post

Miller: Recapitalized Fannie, Freddie a (Bad) 20-year Option

If you're hoping to see the beleaguered Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac adequately recapitalized, you're going to have to wait another two decades or so. But Mary Miller, the Department of the Treasury's undersecretary for domestic finance, is hoping to find another way.

As she put it at Friday's National Housing Conference Annual Policy Symposium in Washington, D.C., the current system of taxpayer-funded GSEs simply doesn't work.

Miller painted a rather grim picture of the GSEs, saying the entities have shut out far too many otherwise-credit-worthy borrowers by making lenders reluctant to lend and by putting the risk squarely on taxpayers' shoulders. Miller's portrait of the American housing market design shows a badly flawed system in which the average taxpayer will get the bill if the market were to crash again. This, she said, would happen despite the federal government's significant presence in the housing market, which includes ongoing funding of the GSEs.

But any perceived health in the current system is a false security, Miller said. The profitability of the GSEs in the past two years has, after all, "been driven by income from their retained portfolios, which benefit from being funded through Treasury capital ... at low rates the private market cannot obtain," she said.

These portfolios remain significant sources of income for entities such as Fannie and Freddie. However, the GSEs are required to shrink their portfolios by 15 percent per year, meaning that the GSEs will not be able to replicate the levels of revenue they've achieved over the past two years. "In short, adequately recapitalizing the GSEs would take longer than many realize or would admit," she said.

To make "a fairer and more sustainable housing finance system" will take a lot more than simply refilling the coffers of Fannie and Freddie—which, she said, would take at least 20 years to do. In the meantime, unless the design of the system is changed, there is little more to go on than crossed fingers that nothing goes wrong until the 2030s.

The cornerstone of this new design should begin with a return of private capital to the center of the system, Miller said. President Barack Obama has embraced this same idea since his first term, saying that the GSE's current model simply allows private shareholders and executives to benefit at the expense of taxpayer losses. The new housing finance system must also provide borrowers widespread access to safe, responsible products, including 30-year fixed-rate mortgages, she said.

Whatever happens will take a lot of work and a lot of patience. "There is no quick-fix solution around this," Miller said. "Only legislation can protect taxpayers by responsibly winding down the GSEs and replacing them with a system where a government guarantee is transparent and explicitly priced."

About Author: Scott Morgan

Scott Morgan is a multi-award-winning journalist and editor based out of Texas. During his 11 years as a newspaper journalist, he wrote more than 4,000 published pieces. He's been recognized for his work since 2001, and his creative writing continues to win acclaim from readers and fellow writers alike. He is also a creative writing teacher and the author of several books, from short fiction to written works about writing.

Check Also

Expert Insights: An Update on Demand Letter Litigation

A recent ruling in Illinois has implications for mortgage servicers operating in the state. Here’s what you need to know.


Featuring daily updates on foreclosure, REO, and the secondary market, DS News has the timely and relevant content you need to stay at the top of your game. Get each day’s most important default servicing news and market information delivered directly to your inbox, complimentary, when you subscribe.