Home / Daily Dose / BCFP Amends Consumer Privacy Regulation
Print This Post Print This Post

BCFP Amends Consumer Privacy Regulation

The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (BCFP) has announced an update in legislation aimed at easing the burden on financial institutions and reducing the risk of consumer confusion. Through Regulation P, legislation has been updated that amends the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which requires annual privacy notices to consumers from financial institutions.

The amendments finalized today allow for certain qualifying institutions to be exempt from these notices, which describe privacy practices of their institutions, including ‘whether and how’ customer’s nonpublic personal information is shared. If the institution shares this information with “unaffiliated third parties” in ways that deviate from GLBA specifications, the institution is required to notify its customers of their opt-out rights, and how to stop the sharing of their information.

Congress amended the GLBA in December 2015, as part of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act). This amendment allows for financial institutions that meet certain conditions to be exempted from these annual notices if the sharing of customer information is limited so that the customer does not have the right to opt-out, and if the institution has not changed its privacy notice from the one previously delivered to the customer.

This rule was issued by the Bureau today in order to implement the legislation and establish deadlines for institutions resuming annual privacy notices “if their practices change and they therefore cease to qualify for the exemption,” the statement said.

In addition to these changes, in certain circumstances, Regulation P allows financial institutions to use an “alternative delivery method to provide annual notices.” This requires, among other things, that the annual notice be posted and accessible on the financial institution’s website.

The amendments to Regulation P in this final rule will become effective 30 days after the date of publication in the federal register.

To read the full ruling, click here.

About Author: Kristina Brewer

Kristina Brewer is the Editorial Assistant of Publications for the Five Star Institute, including DS News and MReport magazine. She is a graduate of the University of North Texas (UNT), where she received her Bachelor of Arts in English with a concentration in rhetoric and writing and a minor in global marketing. During this time, she served as Director of Philanthropy in the national women’s fraternity Zeta Tau Alpha, of which she is an alumna. Her passion for philanthropy continued after university when she was an intern at Keep Denton Beautiful, a local partner of Keep America Beautiful, where she drove membership, organized events, and led social media campaigns. Brewer honed her writing at the North Texas Daily, UNT’s student-run newspaper where she wrote about faculty, mentorship, and student life. Brewer also previously worked at Optimus Business Plans where she helped start-ups create funding proposals, risk assessments, and management plans.

Check Also

Florida Court Questions the Reformation of Deed and Mortgage

Attorney Ian Dolan examines a recent Florida case where the court affirmed the entry of a judgment of foreclosure despite the mortgagor’s claim that a reformation was barred by the statute of limitations. Full details on the case after the link.