Home / Daily Dose / DOJ Finds Complaints Against Default Services Law Firm Unsubstantiated
Print This Post Print This Post

DOJ Finds Complaints Against Default Services Law Firm Unsubstantiated

Unsealed court documents recently obtained by DS News reveal that the United States Government has declined to intervene in a whistleblower complaint against Ohio law firm, Laurito & Laurito LLC for alleged violations of the False Claims Act.

Following a full investigation, a Notice of Declination was filed as the Department of Justice (DOJ) after it could not find anything to substantiate the complaint.

While the plaintiff still has the ability to pursue the lawsuit, to have the government step aside and file a Notice of Declination instead of pursuing the claims of violating the False Claims Act, is a big step toward identifying the validity of the charges against the firm. The DOJ has, in the past, zealously pursued and prosecuted such claims.

In the original filing, a former employee of Laurito and Laurito complained about alleged misdeeds of the firm such as failing to reimburse clients’ court cost deposits when foreclosing on government-issued mortgages. In doing so, the defendant would have been violating the False Claims Act, as clients would have filed FHA reimbursement claims falsely.

However, The U.S. DOJ has not found substantial evidence to support or substantiate these claims, and nothing was found to be wrong with the firm’s process. 

The Notice of Declination was filed earlier this month. In the notice, the U.S. requested that the original Complaint, Order, and the Notice itself be unsealed.

Due to the nature of their work, foreclosure law firms are often the target of legal attacks. Recently, in the case of State of Colorado v. The Castle Law Group LLC et al. DS News reported that Castle Law Group and two other entities were awarded legal fees totaling $1.9 million after the judge found the claims filed against them to be substantially frivolous and groundless. The Court awarded 100 percent of the fees that The Castle Law Group, Caren Castle, and Larry Castle requested, and indicated that the methodology used by Castle Law in applying for the fees was conservative.

Larry Pozner, Partner at Reilly Pozner LLP and lead defense attorney in the Castle Law case, had told DS News, “Law firms who practice in the foreclosure space have enormous responsibilities to the lenders. The cases have to be done rapidly, right, repeatedly, and the law firms must do them at their own risk.”

Read more about the Castle Law case:

Castle Law Defendants Awarded $1.9M in Legal Fees

About Author: Seth Welborn

Seth Welborn is a Reporter for DS News and MReport. A graduate of Harding University, he has covered numerous topics across the real estate and default servicing industries. Additionally, he has written B2B marketing copy for Dallas-based companies such as AT&T. An East Texas Native, he also works part-time as a photographer.
x

Check Also

Is Your Mortgage Servicing Program CARES Act-Compliant?

For mortgage lenders and servicers, the pandemic will prove to be a test of business continuity planning while managing process and regulatory changes in real time, all while maintaining fairness and compliance across all aspects of day-to-day operations.

GET YOUR DAILY DOSE OF DS NEWS

Featuring daily updates on foreclosure, REO, and the secondary market, DS News has the timely and relevant content you need to stay at the top of your game. Get each day’s most important default servicing news and market information delivered directly to your inbox, complimentary, when you subscribe.