Home / Daily Dose / Home Prices Continue to Gain, But at Miniscule Rate
Print This Post Print This Post

Home Prices Continue to Gain, But at Miniscule Rate

New HomesU.S. home prices continued to grow for the eighth straight month in July, though gains slowed to a crawl.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency's (FHFA) monthly House Price Index picked up 0.1 percent from June to July, coming down after a revised 0.3 percent increase in June. Calculated using price data on mortgages sold to or guaranteed by the GSEs, the index provides a look at how homes are performing exclusive of high-end, non-agency loans.

For the 12 months ending in July, FHFA reported house prices were up 4.4 percent. As of the latest index, the national HPI is now 6.4 percent below its peak in April 2007 and is roughly in line with its July 2005 level.

Data was calculated for each of the nation's nine census divisions, each comprised of anywhere from three to eight states. Month-to-month price increases were led by the East North Central census division, including Michigan, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio, and the New England census division, which includes Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut. The East North Central division and New England division each saw growth of 0.4 percent from June to July. At the bottom end was the Middle Atlantic census division, consisting of New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, where prices depreciated 0.5 percent month-over-month in July.

About Author: Tory Barringer

Tory Barringer began his journalism career in early 2011, working as a writer for the University of Texas at Arlington's student newspaper before joining the DS News team in 2012. In addition to contributing to DSNews.com, he is also the online editor for DS News' sister publication, MReport, which focuses on mortgage banking news.

Check Also

2023 Was the Least Affordable Year on Record. Will 2024 Follow Suit?

The least affordable markets included Anaheim and San Francisco, where homebuyers with the typical local income would’ve needed to spend over 80% of their pay on monthly housing costs.