Home / Daily Dose / Judge Throws Out Obama Adminstration’s ‘Disparate Impact’ Housing Rule
Print This Post Print This Post

Judge Throws Out Obama Adminstration’s ‘Disparate Impact’ Housing Rule

gavel-fiveA federal judge ruled on November 3 that the Fair Housing Act does not allow for so-called "disparate impact" claims, which are allegations that can be made based on neutral practices that may unintentionally have a discriminatory effect.

U.S. District Judge Richard Leon ruled that only claims of direct, intentional discrimination could be made under the Fair Housing Act, which was passed in 1968. While the Fair Housing Act does not specifically state it allows disparate claims lawsuits, courts have allowed them for years. Leon said the belief of those in the Obama administration who interpret the Fair Housing Act to allow disparate impact claims "appears to be nothing more than wishful thinking on steroids."

The disparate impact rule in housing was issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in February 2013 and has since resulted in several multi-million dollar fair housing settlements against Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and other lenders.

One example of a disparate impact claim occurred in 2012 in Delaware, when the National Fair Housing Alliance sued Allstate over Allstate's refusal to insure flat-roofed houses. The suit alleged that this had a discriminatory effect on low-income minorities that were most likely to live in those houses.

Leon's ruling is a victory for opponents of the disparate impact rule such as American Insurance Association, which currently has a lawsuit pending in the U.S. District Court against HUD over a disparate impact claim.

Opponents of disparate impact have one more hurdle to clear, however. The issue of whether or not disparate impact lawsuits are allowed under the Fair Housing Act is likely to be heard in the U.S. Supreme Court sometime in the next few months. In October, the Supreme Court agreed to rule on a similar case in Texas involving allegations of the disproportionate awarding of tax credits to developers who own property in low-income minority dominated neighborhoods. The U.S. Supreme Court has never issued a ruling on disparate impact claims.

About Author: Brian Honea

Brian Honea's writing and editing career spans nearly two decades across many forms of media. He served as sports editor for two suburban newspaper chains in the DFW area and has freelanced for such publications as the Yahoo! Contributor Network, Dallas Home Improvement magazine, and the Dallas Morning News. He has written four non-fiction sports books, the latest of which, The Life of Coach Chuck Curtis, was published by the TCU Press in December 2014. A lifelong Texan, Brian received his master's degree from Amberton University in Garland.

Check Also

Federal Reserve Holds Rates Steady Moving Into the New Year

The Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee again chose that no action is better than changing rates as the economy begins to stabilize.