Home / Daily Dose / Public Policy Institute Asserts its Recommendations for FHFA
Print This Post Print This Post

Public Policy Institute Asserts its Recommendations for FHFA

In its Performance & Accountability Report for financial year 2018 last week, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) mentioned its proposed regulation on capital requirements for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The following day, the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) published its lengthy response to the proposal.

The FHFA first proposed the “new framework for risk-based capital requirements and a revised minimum leverage capital requirement for the Enterprises” in June, and it has now expanded its deadline for public comments from September 17 to November 16.

The proposed rule offers two scenarios, one in which the GSEs would maintain capital equaling 2.5 percent of total assets and off-balance sheet guarantees. The second would require the GSEs to hold capital equal to 1.5 percent of trust assets and 4 percent of non-trust assets.

The AEI stated in a letter to the FHFA last week that the proposals were insufficient to support potential risk at the GSEs and laid out detailed alternatives to the FHFA’s proposal.

“Specifically, its binding risk-based rules would not require enough capital to address another housing crisis of comparable magnitude to the most recent one, and its minimum leverage ratios would not be consistent with requirements for global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) given the de facto status of the GSEs as systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs),” according to the AEI.

On the other hand, the AEI asserted its own recommendations “would result in additional risk-based capital of more than 200 basis points relative to FHFA’s proposal and a minimum leverage ratio of 4 percent,” according to the letter.

Operational risks are another concern for the AEI, which stated that the FHFA’s “add-on to cover operation risk is a scant 8 bps.” Continuing, the AEI stated, “For the two GSEs together, that amounts to $3.7 billion for 2017. To give a little bit of context to that, consider that 12 years ago, Fannie Mae restated its earnings downward by $6.3 billion because of accounting errors.”

The AEI also asserted that “The proposed minimum leverage ratios would not produce results comparable to the largest banks for comparable assets.” While the FHFA suggested the GSEs are less risky than banks and should thus have a lower minimum leverage, the AEI suggested it is more relevant to compare the GSEs to global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) in the United States because the GSEs have been deemed systemically important. For G-SIBs, the minimum leverage is 6 percent.

The AEI recommends increasing risk-based capital standards to account by about 200 basis points in total to address going-concern risk, operational risk, model risk, and to address counter-cyclical risks.

The AEI recommends increasing the minimum leverage capital ratio from the proposed 2.5 percent or less to at least 4 percent and proposes limiting the use of preferred stock to meet both risk-based and leverage capital requirements.

About Author: Krista Franks Brock

Krista Franks Brock is a professional writer and editor who has covered the mortgage banking and default servicing sectors since 2011. Previously, she served as managing editor of DS News and Southern Distinction, a regional lifestyle publication. Her work has appeared in a variety of print and online publications, including Consumers Digest, Dallas Style and Design, DS News and DSNews.com, MReport and theMReport.com. She holds degrees in journalism and art from the University of Georgia.

Check Also

2023 Was the Least Affordable Year on Record. Will 2024 Follow Suit?

The least affordable markets included Anaheim and San Francisco, where homebuyers with the typical local income would’ve needed to spend over 80% of their pay on monthly housing costs.