- DSNews - https://dsnews.com -

Lawmakers Seek Improved Consumer Protections From CFPB

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a member of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, and Rep. Hank Johnson are leading 91 U.S. lawmakers in a letter to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) [1] asking the Bureau to protect consumers by conducting a rulemaking on forced arbitration for financial products and services.

“Since the CFPB’s founding 12 years ago, the Bureau has worked tirelessly to protect American consumers, by holding repeat offenders accountable through hundreds of enforcement actions, launching efforts to save Americans billions of dollars in junk fees, and partnering with other agencies to ensure that new technologies comply with existing consumer protection laws,” said the letter [1]. “Unfortunately, many regulations and laws intended to protect consumers continue to be undermined and rendered meaningless by provisions jammed into fine print, such as forced arbitration clauses. Though Congress has limited the use of forced arbitration for certain sectors and cases, the Bureau is best positioned to issue a rulemaking on forced arbitration for financial products and services.”

The CFPB issued a rule limiting class action waivers in contracts for certain financial products and services in 2017, but that rulemaking was overturned by Republicans through the Congressional Review Act [2]. Since then, corporations’ use of forced arbitration has increased, too often leaving consumers with no pathway for accountability when they have been hurt by financial institutions. Studies on forced arbitration released after 2017 show that consumers who are Black, indigenous, people of color or female are more likely than white men to be forced into arbitration.

“Companies hide forced arbitration clauses in the fine print, take-it-or-leave-it terms accompanying many financial products and services,” continued the coalition in their letter [1]. “These fine print traps prohibit consumers from accessing the civil justice system to resolve disputes with financial services companies. Instead, consumers are forced into a non-transparent, private system in which their position is inherently unequal relative to the company. In such an unfair playing field, with no ability to appeal decisions, it is no surprise that consumers rarely prevail over financial services providers. And yet, most consumers are unaware that they are relinquishing their fundamental right to access the court system when they sign up for a financial service or use a financial product.”

Earlier this fall, more than 100 consumer advocacy, labor, and racial justice groups and 18 veteran and military service groups submitted comments to the CFPB supporting a rulemaking limiting forced arbitration in financial products and services. In September 2023, a group of consumer advocate organizations filed a Petition for Rulemaking with the CFPB, asking the Bureau to prohibit the use of pre-dispute arbitration clauses in consumer contracts, in favor of clauses that would permit consumers to choose between arbitration and litigation only after a dispute has arisen. More than 160 law professors submitted a letter in support, explaining that such a rule “is well within the CFPB’s authority.”

Sen. Warren has led oversight of giant financial institutions to protect consumers via a number of initiatives including:

“Restoring consumers’ ability to make the choice about how they wish to exercise their rights is important for a fair, stable, and robust financial marketplace,” closed the letter. “Given the recent findings on the lack of understanding and awareness of forced arbitration, coupled with the worsening corporate tactics stemming from forced arbitration, we urge the Bureau to issue a rule addressing forced arbitration. We also encourage other federal agencies to consider actions to rein in corporate abuse of fine print traps like forced arbitration provisions.