Home / News / Foreclosure / Bankers Advocate Opposition of Mortgage Servicing Amendment
Print This Post Print This Post

Bankers Advocate Opposition of Mortgage Servicing Amendment

The ""American Bankers Association"":http:// has sent a letter to key lawmakers in the Senate, urging them to reject foreclosure legislation proposed by Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine).
[IMAGE]

Their bill, tagged the Regulation of Mortgage Servicing Act, has been introduced as an amendment to the larger economic development legislation (S. 782) currently making its way through Congress.

It addresses several reforms already included in regulatory consent orders, such as a single point-of-contact for borrowers and ending dual-tracking. It also requires an independent, third-party case review prior to foreclosure. This last point is a major sticking point for the bankers group.

In offering up the amendment, Merkley said, ""This economic development bill is designed to help get people back to work, but we won't get the economy moving again until we deal with the foreclosure crisis.""

He added, ""Since foreclosures bring down the prices of surrounding homes, everyone loses when a family is not given a fair chance to refinance. This mortgage servicing amendment will help to keep families in their homes,

[COLUMN_BREAK]

producing a win-win benefit for families and local economies.""

But the American Bankers Association (ABA) says, ""The Merkley/Snowe provision would further destabilize the mortgage and housing markets by suspending legitimate foreclosures already in process imposing new requirements on existing loan terms, and increasing costs for all homeowners as lenders factor in costs imposed by the new requirements.""

In the ABA's letter sent to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), the group went on to say, ""The on-going price declines in the housing market, foreclosures relating to job losses, and other impacts of the recent recession are devastating to borrowers and lenders alike. This legislation, however, will only exacerbate an already difficult situation. Delaying legitimate foreclosures and increasing costs associated with them will only prolong the pain of the current situation.""

ABA also stated that the legislation is ""ill-timed,"" noting that both the state attorneys general and federal banking regulators are already engaged in discussions on how to impose both servicing and foreclosure standards on lenders.

""This legislation would presumably trump and potentially conflict with those efforts, adding further confusion, delay, and cost to an already troubled housing market,"" ABA said.

While Snowe argues that the amendment would help to stave off ""unnecessary foreclosures caused by confusing communications with loan servicers and misfiled or flawed paperwork,"" ABA again stressed that it will only prolong the market correction by slowing down ""legitimate foreclosures"" and they urged Reid and McConnell to lead the Senate in rejecting the amendment.

About Author: Carrie Bay

Carrie Bay is a freelance writer for DS News and its sister publication MReport. She served as online editor for DSNews.com from 2008 through 2011. Prior to joining DS News and the Five Star organization, she managed public relations, marketing, and media relations initiatives for several B2B companies in the financial services, technology, and telecommunications industries. She also wrote for retail and nonprofit organizations upon graduating from Texas A&M University with degrees in journalism and English.
x

Check Also

Senate Hearing Tackles National Flood Insurance Program Reauthorization

Senate Banking Committee Chair Sharrod Brown recently held a hearing to discuss the future of the National Flood Insurance Program, featuring a panel of experts highlighting the many repercussions of an expiration in the program.