Home / Daily Dose / Government Loans Up for 27th Month
Print This Post Print This Post

Government Loans Up for 27th Month

Demand for government-backed purchase loans surged in early 2017, despite an uptick in mortgage rates, according to the latest National Mortgage Risk Index released by the AEI International Center on Housing Risk on Monday.

According to the NMRI, January was the 27th month that government-guaranteed purchase loans rose in volume, jumped up 10 percent from a year earlier. The number of first-time buyers rose 11 percent.

By dollars, volume was up 14 percent over the year, with RHS volume outpacing FHA volume significantly. Year-over-year, RHS loan count was up nearly 23 percent. Loans from Freddie Mac rose 13.3 percent, VA loans rose 13.2 percent, Fannie Mae loans jumped 10.8 percent, and FHA loans increased just 5.1 percent. This large gap is likely due to RHS’s cut in mortgage insurance premiums that went into effect in October.

“As expected, RHS’ volume jumped immediately after its MIP cut in October 2016,” the NMRI stated. “Since the cut, RHS has grown faster than FHA, its most direct competitor. In January, its growth surpassed all other agencies.”

Agency credit easing may be offsetting ever-rising mortgage rates, according to the NMRI, though this could create an unwanted snowball effect if allowed to continue.

“As prices have been rising, dollar volume has been outgrowing count volume,” the NMRI reported. “Credit easing, particularly by the FHA, is fueling this trend. This creates a vicious cycle of price appreciation and credit easing.”

But while higher rates may not be hurting the government-backed purchase market, the NMRI shows they are having a big impact on refinancing. According to the report, by-count volume on refinances declined 40 percent since October 2016—and that’s with a 1.5 ppt increase in risk. Almost half of all refinances in January were cash-outs, more than double the number four years ago.

Overall risk was up slightly over the year. The composite NMRI rose 0.2 percent. Non-bank lenders took more risk than their more traditional counterparts.

“A huge gap has opened up in the riskiness of purchase loans originated by banks and nonbanks,” the NMRI reported. “Banks have reduced risk by shifting away from subprime borrowers and low down payment loans. In contrast, nonbanks have increased risk by lowering standards for every major risk factor, making them the preferred risk channel.”

According to AEI, “the National Mortgage Risk Index (NMRI) measures how government guaranteed loans with a first payment date in a given month would perform if subjected to the same stress as in the financial crisis that began in 2007.” This iteration analyzed data on 26.2 million loans guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA, VA, and RHS, including 12 million purchase loans and 14.2 million refinance loans.

View the full NMRI at HousingRisk.org.

About Author: Aly J. Yale

Aly J. Yale is a longtime writer and editor from Texas. Her resume boasts positions with The Dallas Morning News, NBC, PBS, and various other regional and national publications. She has also worked with both the Five Star Institute and REO Red Book, as well as various other mortgage industry clients on content strategy, blogging, marketing, and more.

Check Also

2023 Was the Least Affordable Year on Record. Will 2024 Follow Suit?

The least affordable markets included Anaheim and San Francisco, where homebuyers with the typical local income would’ve needed to spend over 80% of their pay on monthly housing costs.