Home / News / Government / SEC Considering Legal Action Against S&P for Rating of Mortgage Debt
Print This Post Print This Post

SEC Considering Legal Action Against S&P for Rating of Mortgage Debt

The nation's foremost financial securities regulator is considering bringing a civil injunction against ""Standard & Poor's"":http://www.standardandpoors.com (S&P) for its rating of a ""collateralized debt obligation"":http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collateralized_debt_obligation (CDO) linked to high-risk mortgages.


S&P's parent company, New York-based ""McGraw-Hill Cos."":http://www.mcgraw-hill.com/, told investors Monday that it has received a ""Wells Notice"" from the ""Securities and Exchange Commission"":http://www.sec.gov (SEC) stating that the federal agency may recommend instituting a civil injunctive action against S&P along with civil money penalties and disgorgement of fees.

A Wells Notice from the SEC signals the recipient is the subject of a formal investigation and the federal agency is planning to proceed with some form of enforcement action.

The case centers around S&P's rating of a $1.6 billion CDO in 2007 known as Delphinus CDO 2007-1. In a report issued last spring, the U.S. Senate’s Permanent Subcom-


mittee on Investigations cited this hybrid CDO as a “striking example” of “how inflated credit ratings contributed to the financial crisis by masking the true risk of many mortgage related securities.”

According to ""the senators’ report"":http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/_files/Financial_Crisis/FinancialCrisisReport.pdf, S&P rated six Delphinus tranches AAA in July and August 2007. By the end of that year, S&P began downgrading its securities, and by the end of 2008, had fully downgraded the AAA-rated securities to junk status.

""Moody’s"":http://www.moodys.com gave AAA ratings to seven Delphinus tranches and eventually downgraded those to junk status as well, along the same timelines as S&P.

The Senate subcommittee uncovered evidence, including internal emails, showing that analysts at both ratings agencies were aware of the increasing risks in the mortgage market in the years leading up to the financial crisis, but failed to adjust their ratings to accurately reflect the higher risk associated with lax lending standards, poor quality loans, and unsustainable housing prices.

Investigators attributed a number of factors to the agencies assignments of inaccurate credit ratings to RMBS and CEO securities, including pressure from investment banks to inflate ratings and the inherent business drive to increase market share.

Commenting on the latest action in the saga by the SEC, McGraw-Hill said in a statement that S&P has been cooperating with the federal agency and intends to continue to work with the SEC towards a resolution.

About Author: Carrie Bay

Carrie Bay is a freelance writer for DS News and its sister publication MReport. She served as online editor for DSNews.com from 2008 through 2011. Prior to joining DS News and the Five Star organization, she managed public relations, marketing, and media relations initiatives for several B2B companies in the financial services, technology, and telecommunications industries. She also wrote for retail and nonprofit organizations upon graduating from Texas A&M University with degrees in journalism and English.

Check Also

CWCOT Webinar: Insights Into Critical Changes

Join DS News next week for a high-level exploration of the CWCOT program changes enabled by the recent HUD mortgagee letter.


Featuring daily updates on foreclosure, REO, and the secondary market, DS News has the timely and relevant content you need to stay at the top of your game. Get each day’s most important default servicing news and market information delivered directly to your inbox, complimentary, when you subscribe.