Home / Daily Dose / CFPB Issues New Interpretive Rule
Print This Post Print This Post

CFPB Issues New Interpretive Rule

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has issued a new interpretive rule that describes individual states’ authorities to pursue lawbreaking companies and individuals that violate the provisions of federal consumer financial protection law. This announcement is part of the CFPB’s expansion of its efforts to support state enforcement activity. 

“In the years leading up to the financial crisis, federal regulators undermined states seeking to protect families and businesses from abuses in the mortgage market,” said Rohit Chopra, the CFPB Director. “Our action today demonstrates our commitment to promoting state enforcement, not suffocating it.” 

Congress created the CFPB in 2010 through the passage of the Consumer Financial Protection Act as it recognized the role of states in “protecting consumers from financial fraud, scams, and other wrongdoing.” Through this act, Congress broadly restricted the ability of federal banking regulators to preempt state consumer financial protections. 

Additionally, Congress enhanced states’ enforcement abilities so that both state attorneys general and state regulators can enforce CFPB provisions. In the 12 years since the CFPB was created, states have used it in 33 public enforcement actions to protect consumers. Some of those 33 cases were conducted with the help of the CPFB, while others were brought by an individual state or multi-state group. 

This interpretive rule is meant to be used in addition to other collaboration and cooperation efforts between the CFPB and states. The CFPB has memoranda of understanding to promote and enable these efforts with over 20 state attorney general offices, as well as regulators in all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. 

According to the CFPB, the key takeaways from the interpretive rule include: 

  • States can enforce the Consumer Financial Protection Act, including the provision making it unlawful for covered persons or service providers to violate any provision of federal consumer financial protection law. This provision covers the Consumer Financial Protection Act itself as well as its 18 enumerated consumer laws and certain other laws, along with any rule or order prescribed by the CFPB under the Consumer Financial Protection Act, an enumerated consumer law, or pursuant to certain other authorities. 
  • States can pursue claims and actions against a broad range of entities. The Consumer Financial Protection Act outlines entities over which the CFPB may exercise its enforcement authority under the statute. States are able to bring actions against a broader cross-section of companies and individuals. 
  • CFPB enforcement actions do not put a halt to state actions. Sometimes states bring enforcement actions in coordination with the CFPB. A state may also bring an enforcement action to stop or remediate harm that is not addressed by a CFPB enforcement action against the same entity. Nothing in the Consumer Financial Protection Act precludes these complementary enforcement activities that serve to protect consumers at both the national and state levels. 

Click here to read the new 10-page rule. 

About Author: Kyle G. Horst

Kyle G. Horst is a reporter for DS News and MReport. A graduate of the University of Texas at Tyler, he has worked for a number of daily, weekly, and monthly publications in South Dakota and Texas. With more than 10 years of experience in community journalism, he has won a number of state, national, and international awards for his writing and photography including best newspaper design by the Associated Press Managing Editors Group and the international iPhone photographer of the year by the iPhone Photography Awards. He most recently worked as editor of Community Impact Newspaper covering a number of Dallas-Ft. Worth communities on a hyperlocal level. Contact Kyle G. at [email protected].
x

Check Also

Federal Reserve Holds Rates Steady Moving Into the New Year

The Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee again chose that no action is better than changing rates as the economy begins to stabilize.