Home / Daily Dose / Nomura, FHFA Present Closing Arguments in MBS Trial
Print This Post Print This Post

Nomura, FHFA Present Closing Arguments in MBS Trial

gavel-fiveThe court battle between the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and Nomura Holdings is nearing a climax after three weeks, as both sides presented closing arguments on Thursday.

Nomura and the Royal Bank of Scotland, also a defendant in the case, are the first two financial institutions out of 18 sued by the FHFA in 2011 that failed to reach a settlement and took the case to trial. FHFA sued the 18 institutions to recoup U.S. taxpayer costs following the government's $188 billion bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2008, after which the government seized control of both Enterprises.

FHFA is seeking $1.1 billion in damages. The Agency alleges it suffered monumental losses when the sponsor of the mortgage-backed securities, Tokyo-based Nomura, and the securities' underwriter, Royal Bank of Scotland, did not follow underwriting guidelines on 68 percent of a sample of a bundle of securities backing more than $2 billion worth of mortgages sold to the GSEs prior to the financial crisis of 2008.

According to a report from Reuters, Nomura's lawyer, David Tulchin, said in the closing arguments that the losses incurred by the FHFA were due to macroeconomic factors and not false or misleading statements by the banks. He also said the FHFA had provided little testimony during the trial to back up its claims and that the Agency had relied on "voodoo science" to analyze the mortgage-backed securities, according to Reuters.

Tulchin told DS News in an email that, "Nomura is pleased to have had the opportunity to take this case to trial, and is optimistic about the ultimate outcome."

A lawyer representing the FHFA, Philippe Selendy, pointed to widespread misrepresentation of the quality of mortgage-backed securities on the part of banks leading up to the economic downturn, according to the report. Selendy accused Nomura and RBS of "colossal incompetence" and "deceit" with regards to the documents for the mortgage-backed securities they sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to the report.

Judge Denise Cote is overseeing the non-jury trial in the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of New York in Manhattan. The trial began on March 16.

About Author: Brian Honea

Brian Honea's writing and editing career spans nearly two decades across many forms of media. He served as sports editor for two suburban newspaper chains in the DFW area and has freelanced for such publications as the Yahoo! Contributor Network, Dallas Home Improvement magazine, and the Dallas Morning News. He has written four non-fiction sports books, the latest of which, The Life of Coach Chuck Curtis, was published by the TCU Press in December 2014. A lifelong Texan, Brian received his master's degree from Amberton University in Garland.
x

Check Also

What’s Best for Banks?

As the Federal Reserve and other regulators roll back some post-2008 banking and lending regulations, some worry that the economy may put at risk during the next downturn,

GET YOUR DAILY DOSE OF DS NEWS

Featuring daily updates on foreclosure, REO, and the secondary market, DS News has the timely and relevant content you need to stay at the top of your game. Get each day’s most important default servicing news and market information delivered directly to your inbox, complimentary, when you subscribe.